Home Blog Page 164

Countless LGBT+ folk have same epic response to conspiracy theorist who said gay people can’t be happy – Yahoo Eurosport UK

LGBT+ people have shared photos showing just how gloriously ecstatic they really are after a far-right conspiracy theorist said gay people can’t be happy.

Gemma O’Doherty, a former journalist from Ireland who has been permanently banned from Twitter, made her incendiary comments about queer people in a live-streamed video.

“I don’t see anyone or know anyone who is gay who is happy. I just don’t,” O’Doherty said in the video, which was subsequently uploaded to Twitter.

“It’s a miserable lifestyle. It’s a promiscuous lifestyle. It’s a dark lifestyle.”

The video was widely-shared on social media, prompting LGBT+ people to share photos of themselves showing just how happy, bright and colourful their lives are.

Emmerdale star Michelle Hardwick shot the far-right down with beautiful family photo

Michelle Hardwick, who plays Vanessa Woodfield in Emmerdale, led the charge, sharing a gorgeous photo of herself, her wife and their son together on a sunny day.

“Yup, this picture radiates misery,” Hardwick tweeted, along with a smiley face emoji and a Pride-flag emoji.

Countless other queer people responded to O’Doherty’s video with their own photos showing just how happy they are.

Gemma O’Doherty was once a highly-regarded journalist in Ireland where she worked for the Irish Independent. In recent years, she has become known for sharing conspiracy theories about migration, George Soros and Islam.

In 2019, a mixed-race couple from Meath, Ireland, were dogpiled with racist abuse after O’Doherty shared a Lidl advert they were featured in. Writing on Twitter at the time, O’Doherty alluded to the white nationalist “Great Replacement” conspiracy theory, which falsely claims white people are being replaced by people of other ethnicities.

O’Doherty was permanently suspended from Twitter in July 2020 following repeated violations of the social media platform’s policies. She was banned from YouTube in 2019 shortly after she posted a video in which she spoke about ethnic minorities in Ireland.

In 2018, O’Doherty had a very public run-in with Ireland’s foremost drag queen Panti Bliss after she asked for her support in the country’s presidential election.

Panti Bliss shared O’Doherty’s plea for help on Twitter, saying her alleged support for the LGBT+ community was “bulls**t”.

Donald Trump was ‘repulsed’ by LGBT+ people, claims fixer Michael Cohen – PinkNews

Former President Donald Trump in the East Room of the White House on January 24, 2020 (Drew Angerer/Getty)

Michael Cohen, Donald Trump’s onetime lawyer and fixer, has claimed the former US president was “repulsed” by LGBT+ people.

The disbarred lawyer told the Raw Story Podcast that as much Trump and his cronies sought to paint him as a modern Republican – a balm of sorts for a party so often seen as out of step with current society – he was anything but.

Between very rarely even acknowledging the LGBT+ community and relentlessly rolling back trans rights, queer Americans knew well the apathy Donald Trump held towards them – even as his wife Melania claimed otherwise.

Cohen said of Trump’s views of the queer community: “He thinks about them as much as he thinks about, ya’know, nothing.

“He doesn’t care about the community. In fact, he’s basically repulsed by the community.”

“He doesn’t care if you’re LGBT+, ’cause you don’t mean anything to him,” he added.

Cohen went onto share a story where Trump said he knew a man who “hated” having a gay son. And in a plot twist nobody saw coming, this really wasn’t the case.

He recalled that Trump told him: “Oh, you know, ‘A friend of mine has a son, who’s gay, and you know, he’s really rich […] his father hates it.’”

Michael Cohen gets into an lift at Trump Tower. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

“So it’s not true. I happen to know the family. The father doesn’t hate it.

“Now, would the father prefer him to be, you know, heterosexual? I don’t know. I never asked him.

“Maybe yes, no, I don’t know. It’s none of my business, it’s between them. But Trump then puts himself into the dead centre.”

On the topic of racism, a similarly barbed approach from the real estate mogul, said Cohen.

While he said he didn’t work for Trump since he was “in junior high school, or high school” at the time, Cohen claimed that it is “well-documented” that Trump “is a racist”.

Overall, Cohen, who has increasingly dished out Trump’s sordid dealings amid a federal investigation into his finances, described Trump as vastly indifferent to minority groups.

“He doesn’t care if you’re Black, right?” Coehn said. “He doesn’t like you.

“He doesn’t care if you’re white, he doesn’t like you really, either — unless, of course, you’re a Trump supporter. Right?

“He doesn’t care if you’re LGBT+, ’cause you don’t mean anything to him.

“That’s the problem, the man lacks any relationships. I mean, it’s why Donald Trump has no friends.”

Christian-backed foster agency says it’ll punish kids if it can’t discriminate against gay couples – Yahoo Eurosport UK

A foster agency with ties to the Baptist in Kentucky has said it will punish children if it’s not allowed to freely discriminate queer couples.

Sunrise Children’s Services has refused to sign a contract with the state of Kentucky unless it is given an exemption on religious grounds to bar queer couples from adopting.

The agency, one of the largest and oldest in the state, must renew its contract with the Kentucky State Cabinet for Health and Family Services each year to secure vital funding to support its users.

But a standoff has been sparked around a new clause from state officials to ban discrimination based on sexual orientation, according to the Associated Press.

Sunrise leaders have refused to renew the contract, claiming that sponsoring same-sex couples as foster or adoptive parents could clash against their religious beliefs.

According to the agency’s website, Sunrise Children’s Services provides care for around 1,000 abused and neglected children and family members statewide.

And if the state loses Sunrise, which it has been contracted with for at least 50 years and is one of Kentucky’s largest service providers, it places an already strained child welfare system into further jeopardy.

“You cannot pivot from losing such a large provider of child welfare services and not anticipate some degree of disruption,” Terry Brooks, executive director of Kentucky Youth Advocates, told AP.

This almost blunt dismissal of Sunrise’s willingness to compromise its care for children in favour of religious beliefs was shared among local LGBT+ advocacy groups

“If Sunrise Children’s Services doesn’t want to abide by that, that’s fine,” said Chris Hartman, executive director of the Fairness Campaign.

“They shouldn’t have access to state money, state contracts or children in the state’s care.”

Moreover, Hartman alleged that LGBT+ young people in Sunrise’s care are “deeply closeted” out of fear of “indoctrination and proselytization”.

Such claims, Sunrise’s attorney John Sheller said, are “outrageous”. The shelter “willingly and gladly” accepts queer youth and will not, he alleged, force them to undergo conversion therapy.

The agency has until 30 June to sign the contract. If it does decline, Kentucky state officials have vowed to stop placing children into the agency’s care as well as cut access to state funding.

It’s the latest round between LGBT+ rights and Sunrise Children’s Services, which has long been dogged by criticism for its anti-queer policies that are, in part, the upshot of its entrenched ties to the Baptist church.

In 2014, Sunrise bosses sought to peel back its ban on hiring queer people. At the time, similar concerns over a loss of taxpayer funding were floated amid then proposed anti-discrimination legislation.

But the Sunrise board shot down the bid and the Kentucky Baptist Convention passed a no-confidence vote to boot the boss out of the agency.

The swift reprisal came after Church benefactors across Kentucky choked it of their donations.

It all comes amid a showdown between religious freedoms and LGBT+ rights in the Supreme Court.

In just weeks, a decision is expected to be handed down about a case in Pennsylvania where a Catholic adoption and foster care agency refused to sig a contract that didn’t allow it to discrimination against LGBT+ people.

Special creator Ryan O’Connell weighs in on straight actors playing gay – PinkNews

Special star Ryan O’Connell has taken aim at straight actors who play gay characters.

Speaking to The Guardian, the actor and writer mocked those who furiously defend straight actors who take on gay roles.

Adopting a “shrill straight-splaining voice”, O’Connell said: “It’s called acting! It’s literally their job!” echoing the arguments most frequently wheeled out in favour of straight people playing gay on-screen.

“‘Honey, baby, sweetie, I understand what acting is. I’m Emmy-nominated!’ But the reality is that if you’re a straight actor, you already have more opportunities than an out gay actor,” he explained.

“Why would I take another role from them and give it to someone straight?” he asked.

O’Connell said he specifically cast gay actors to play gay characters in Special, and he even cast some queer people to play straight roles in a bid to right the historic wrongs facing LGBT+ actors.

“Can you believe it? It’s possible!” he said.

Special star Ryan O’Connell says Hollywood treats disabled people like ‘inspiration porn’

Elsewhere in the interview, O’Connell – who has cerebral palsy – opened up about the discrimination disabled people routinely face in Hollywood.

O’Connell said ableism is “so systemic and ingrained in our culture”, adding: “I don’t think Hollywood is like Mr Burns cackling behind a desk, going ‘Keep those disable people out!’ It’s more that no one considers disabled people in general, which is very dark and very sad.

“We’re usually only there for ‘inspiration porn’ or to serve an able-bodied character’s personal growth.”

O’Connell said that will only change when more disabled creators are working behind the scenes on films and television shows.

“We need to stop putting disabled characters in the hands of able-bodied people because that doesn’t give us money or opportunities, and they don’t fully get what it’s like,” he said.

The second and final season of Special – which follows a young disabled gay man as he navigates life in Los Angeles – debuted on Netflix on 20 May.

Speaking to HuffPost ahead of the second season’s release date, O’Connell said he wants Special to be remembered for “lube and disabled awareness“.

“I want my show to be known for topping, bottoming, top anxiety, lube – all those things,” he said.

“I want to take the mystery and shame out of gay sex by depicting it as I’ve experienced it: erotic, humiliating, empowering, funny and intense, all within the same thrust.”

Special creator Ryan O’Connell eloquently weighs in on straight actors playing gay characters – Yahoo Eurosport UK

Special star Ryan O’Connell has taken aim at straight actors who play gay characters.

Speaking to The Guardian, the actor and writer mocked those who furiously defend straight actors who take on gay roles.

Adopting a “shrill straight-splaining voice”, O’Connell said: “It’s called acting! It’s literally their job!” echoing the arguments most frequently wheeled out in favour of straight people playing gay on-screen.

“‘Honey, baby, sweetie, I understand what acting is. I’m Emmy-nominated!’ But the reality is that if you’re a straight actor, you already have more opportunities than an out gay actor,” he explained.

“Why would I take another role from them and give it to someone straight?” he asked.

O’Connell said he specifically cast gay actors to play gay characters in Special, and he even cast some queer people to play straight roles in a bid to right the historic wrongs facing LGBT+ actors.

“Can you believe it? It’s possible!” he said.

Special star Ryan O’Connell says Hollywood treats disabled people like ‘inspiration porn’

Elsewhere in the interview, O’Connell – who has cerebral palsy – opened up about the discrimination disabled people routinely face in Hollywood.

O’Connell said ableism is “so systemic and ingrained in our culture”, adding: “I don’t think Hollywood is like Mr Burns cackling behind a desk, going ‘Keep those disable people out!’ It’s more that no one considers disabled people in general, which is very dark and very sad.

“We’re usually only there for ‘inspiration porn’ or to serve an able-bodied character’s personal growth.”

O’Connell said that will only change when more disabled creators are working behind the scenes on films and television shows.

“We need to stop putting disabled characters in the hands of able-bodied people because that doesn’t give us money or opportunities, and they don’t fully get what it’s like,” he said.

The second and final season of Special – which follows a young disabled gay man as he navigates life in Los Angeles – debuted on Netflix on 20 May.

Speaking to HuffPost ahead of the second season’s release date, O’Connell said he wants Special to be remembered for “lube and disabled awareness“.

“I want my show to be known for topping, bottoming, top anxiety, lube – all those things,” he said.

“I want to take the mystery and shame out of gay sex by depicting it as I’ve experienced it: erotic, humiliating, empowering, funny and intense, all within the same thrust.”

Exclusive-G7 to back minimum global corporate tax, vow to keep support for economy – draft – Yahoo Finance UK

By Jan Strupczewski

BRUSSELS (Reuters) -Finance ministers from the group of seven rich nations (G7) will vow this week to support their economies as they emerge from the pandemic and reach an “ambitious” deal on a minimum global corporate tax in July, a draft communique showed.

G7 officials, set to meet in London on June 4-5, will also say that once the recovery is well established, they will need to “ensure long-term sustainability of public finances”, which is understood to be code for a gradual withdrawal of stimulus.

The G7 comprises the United States, Japan, Britain, Germany, France, Italy and Canada.

“We commit to not withdrawing policy support too soon and investing to promote growth, create high-quality jobs and address climate change and inequalities,” the draft communique, seen by Reuters, said.

“Once the recovery is firmly established, we need to ensure the long-term sustainability of public finances to enable us to respond to future crises,” the draft said, without specifying how the G7 would deem the recovery to be considered firm.

G7 governments have been pumping trillions of dollars into their economies to keep them alive since the start of the pandemic in March 2020 as repeated lockdowns pushed the world into a deep recession.

To help alleviate the strain on public finances, the draft said the G7 strongly supported the efforts of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to set a global minimum corporate tax level that would ensure large multinationals paid their fair share of taxes.

Such a tax would aim to solve the problem of large companies that generate huge revenues but pay very little tax because they set up offices for tax purposes in low-tax jurisdictions.

The solution the OECD is working on would force a minimum global level of tax on all corporate revenues, no matter where a company chooses to set up its headquarters for tax purposes.

“We commit to reaching an equitable solution on the allocation of taxing rights and to a high level of ambition on the rate for a global minimum tax,” the draft said, without mentioning any numbers.

The United States proposed earlier in May to set the minimum tax at 15%, down from the 21% it proposed in April, and the lower level seemed to quickly receive broad backing in Europe.

“We … look forward to reaching an agreement at the July meeting of G20 finance ministers and central bank governors,” the G7 draft said.

It said there was an overwhelming moral, scientific and economic case for ensuring wide access to COVID-19 vaccines, as the global economy would not be safe until the virus is under control everywhere.

The G7 will therefore call on the International Monetary Fund to use its funds for buying vaccines and on the private sector to step up its contribution too.

The draft said the G7 would also support mandatory climate-related financial disclosures by companies that provide “consistent and decision-useful” information for markets.

“We commit to properly embed climate change and biodiversity loss considerations into economic and financial policymaking, including addressing the macroeconomic impacts and the optimal use of policy levers such as carbon pricing,” the draft said.

The G7 would also seek to coordinate globally on what constitutes sustainable, green investment to avoid confusion among investors.

(Reporting by Jan Strupczewski; Editing by Andrew Cawthorne and David Clarke)

Congress hopeful thinks a ‘flamboyant gay’ in Cruella has ‘ruined his childhood’ – PinkNews

Omar Navarro said his children has been ruined by a “flamboyant gay”. (Facebook/ Omar Navarro)

Republican congressional candidate and convicted stalker Omar Navarro has said a “flamboyant gay” in Disney’s Cruella has “ruined his childhood”.

Navarro, who is running for the seat of California’s 43rd congressional district against Maxine Waters, has publicly opposed LGBT+ rights, declaring last year that “you cannot be for gay marriage and also be Christian”. 

But on Sunday (30 May), the Republican congressional hopeful took to Twitter to declare that Disney was “ruining his childhood” by daring to include an LGBT+ character in its Cruella remake.

He wrote: “The new Disney Cruella with Emma Stone just ruined my childhood with an openly flamboyant gay in the movie.

“Disney persist shoving the LGBT agenda down our throat.”

This isn’t the first time Navarro has expressed his concern over Disney “shoving the LGBT agenda” down the throats of conservative Christians.

Last year, when Disney announced it a protagonist on the Disney Channel’s The Owl House is canonically bisexual, Navarro was equally outraged.

He shared on Facebook:”Disney confirms its first bisexual lead character.

“I don’t agree with this crap being pushed down our throats. What people do at home is there business but publicly I shouldn’t have to be forced.

“Will Christians please stand up?”

Navarro has also frequently ranted about Drag Queen Story Hours, claiming the performers who simply read stories to kids are “indoctrinating” them.

In a letter to all parents, published in 2019 by The American Reporter, he said: “Would you let… pornography stars arrive at your child’s classroom dressed in their performance costumes and ‘teach’ (i.e. indoctrinate) kids about sex? No?

“Then why would you allow transvestites, transgendered, lesbians and/or homosexuals impact the impressionable minds of your children?

“Adults can do whatever they like, but when it comes to kids, it’s a question of values. And values need to be taught.”

Navarro, who pleaded guilty to stalking his former girlfriend and spent six months in prison in 2019, was defeated by long-time Democratic congressperson Waters in 2016, 2018, and 2020, and is set to run against her again in 2022.

Right-wing crank Omar Navarro thinks a ‘flamboyant gay’ in Disney’s Cruella has ‘ruined his childhood’ – Yahoo Eurosport UK

Republican congressional candidate and convicted stalker Omar Navarro has said a “flamboyant gay” in Disney’s Cruella has “ruined his childhood”.

Navarro, who is running for the seat of California’s 43rd congressional district against Maxine Waters, has publicly opposed LGBT+ rights, declaring last year that “you cannot be for gay marriage and also be Christian”.

But on Sunday (30 May), the Republican congressional hopeful took to Twitter to declare that Disney was “ruining his childhood” by daring to include an LGBT+ character in its Cruella remake.

He wrote: “The new Disney Cruella with Emma Stone just ruined my childhood with an openly flamboyant gay in the movie.

“Disney persist shoving the LGBT agenda down our throat.”

This isn’t the first time Navarro has expressed his concern over Disney “shoving the LGBT agenda” down the throats of conservative Christians.

Last year, when Disney announced it a protagonist on the Disney Channel’s The Owl House is canonically bisexual, Navarro was equally outraged.

He shared on Facebook:”Disney confirms its first bisexual lead character.

“I don’t agree with this crap being pushed down our throats. What people do at home is there business but publicly I shouldn’t have to be forced.

“Will Christians please stand up?”

Navarro has also frequently ranted about Drag Queen Story Hours, claiming the performers who simply read stories to kids are “indoctrinating” them.

In a letter to all parents, published in 2019 by The American Reporter, he said: “Would you let… pornography stars arrive at your child’s classroom dressed in their performance costumes and ‘teach’ (i.e. indoctrinate) kids about sex? No?

“Then why would you allow transvestites, transgendered, lesbians and/or homosexuals impact the impressionable minds of your children?

“Adults can do whatever they like, but when it comes to kids, it’s a question of values. And values need to be taught.”

Navarro, who pleaded guilty to stalking his former girlfriend and spent six months in prison in 2019, was defeated by long-time Democratic congressperson Waters in 2016, 2018, and 2020, and is set to run against her again in 2022.

The Hot New Advantage in Sports: Being Old – The Wall Street Journal

In February, Tom Brady led the Tampa Bay Buccaneers to a Super Bowl title at age 43, his second championship in his 40s, and his seventh overall. The win also minted Tampa Bay head coach Bruce Arians as the oldest head coach to win a Super Bowl, at age 68. 

Then, last weekend, a fit, 50-year-old Phil Mickelson went out and pocketed the PGA Championship, outdueling golf’s thick-shouldered rocket-hitters to become the sport’s oldest major tournament winner. 

Finally, on Sunday, Helio Castroneves cannily passed 24-year-old Alex Palou with two laps to go to win the Indianapolis 500—at age 46. 

In victory, Castroneves cited Brady and Mickelson as inspirations. 

“The old guys still got it, still kicking the young guys’ butts,” Castroneves said after the win, which tied him with three others (Rick Mears, A.J. Foyt and Al Unser) with four Indy 500 titles. 

Castroneves’s sentiment may be brusque, but it’s hard to argue—today’s sports geezer revolution feels far and wide. At the moment, there’s a plucky battle of the elders happening in the NBA playoffs—36-year-old LeBron James and 36-year-old Chris Paul squaring off in a fierce battle between the Los Angeles Lakers and Phoenix Suns. In the WNBA, the legendary 40-year-old Sue Bird is back for her 18th season, a title defense with the Seattle Storm.

Across the pond at the French Open, you’ve got 40-year-old Venus Williams, her 39-year-old sister, Serena, and, on the men’s side, another 39-year-old, some geezer from Switzerland named Roger Federer who’s got a handsome-looking one-handed backhand. 

In gymnastics, you’ve got former all-around champion Chellsie Memmel, returning to the sport at age 32—not exactly a sports geezer age, but old enough that some of Memmel’s current competition were rolling around in cribs when she won her world title in 2005. 

Meanwhile, Chicago’s Arthur Muir—grandfather of six—just became the oldest American to summit Mount Everest, at age 75. (He started climbing at 68!) 

I’m not sure where to put this last one, but there’s also next weekend’s pay-per-view exhibition boxing match between 44-year-old Floyd Mayweather and 26-year-old YouTube star Logan Paul. The Miami fight is being billed as an intriguing curiosity, a generational battle between an all-time boxing great and a raffish social media phenom…but I have a slight feeling this event might just be trying to take people’s money. 

This much is true: in sports, age feels increasingly less consequential. With improved training and travel regimens, smarter diets and broader overall knowledge about bodies, athletic lives are extending—and winning.  

Brady is the most frequently cited example of this, as he appears to be aging in reverse, adhering to a famously strict diet that has him steering clear of nightshades and turning into the Orville Redenbacher of avocado ice cream. 

It’s flipping the traditional script. Nature conditions us to expect that, in sports, youth will prevail, that experience will eventually be no match for sprightly strength and power. 

How many of us sat around last weekend dreading a potential Mickelson crumble, waiting for one of golf’s younger stars to rise? 

It didn’t happen. And while it’s pretty hard to compare the physical task of winning a golf major to winning a Super Bowl—to say nothing of crossing the finish line first at the Brickyard—you can detect common threads in these victories, from their tenacity to their self-discipline to their unshakable positivity. Brady remains absurdly focused for a seven-time champion. Castrovenes talked Sunday of summoning the energy of racing fans. When Mickelson won in Kiawah, his signature tactic wasn’t his ball striking, or craftiness in the short game, but how he regularly stepped away from a shot to refocus and visualize an outcome. 

That’s wisdom, perhaps the ultimate edge in sports.  

Here’s the other thing: these victories aren’t simply late career validations, exclamation points on the way out the door to retirement. Today’s sports geezers appear to be in no rush to step away. 

Brady’s practicing with his Tampa Bay teammates, eager for a repeat and an eighth ring. There’s now speculation about whether Mickelson could turn back the clock again in June at the U.S. Open at Torrey Pines. (Oddsmakers are skeptical, penciling in Mickelson at 50-1, which is, to be fair, an improvement upon the 300-1 odds set before the PGA Championship.) On July 6, Mickelson and Brady, like Matthau and Lemmon, will pair up for a golf exhibition against younger guns Bryson DeChambeau and Aaron Rodgers. 

As for Castroneves, the pressure will now be on to chase Indianapolis 500 title No. 5, which nobody’s ever done. He’ll very likely get a few more chances to do it. At 46 years, 20 days, Castroneves didn’t even make the podium for oldest Indy 500 champions—he’s fourth behind Al and Bobby Unser, who both did it at 47, as well as fellow Brazilian Emerson Fittipaldi, who did it at 46 years, 169 days. 

He’s really just a kid, when you think about it.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What do you think of this recent run of older athletes winning titles in sports?

Write to Jason Gay at Jason.Gay@wsj.com

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Tokyo Olympics Committee Silent on Japan lawmakers’ Anti-LGBTQ+ Comments – pride source.com

The committee that is organizing the 2021 Summer Olympics in Tokyo has declined to say whether Japanese lawmakers’ anti-LGBTQ comments violated the Olympic Charter’s nondiscrimination clause.

Mainichi, a Japanese newspaper, reported members of Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party who attended a meeting about an LGBTQ+ rights bill described LGBTQ+ people as “morally unacceptable” and said “from a biological perspective, human beings must preserve the species, LGBT people go against this.”

The International Olympic Committee in 2014 added sexual orientation to the Olympic Charter’s nondiscrimination clause, known as Principle 6, after Russia’s LGBTQ+ rights record overshadowed the 2014 Winter Olympics that took place that year in the Black Sea resort city of Sochi.

“Please be aware that per the Fundamental Principles of Olympism in the Olympic Charter, as a sports organization within the Olympic Movement, that Tokyo 2020 applies political neutrality and cannot comment on matters concerning remarks from politicians, government legislature and the like,” Tokyo 2020 told the Washington Blade on Wednesday in an emailed statement.

Tokyo 2020 President Seiko Hashimoto, who is a member of the Liberal Democratic Party, on April 27 visited Pride House Tokyo Legacy, which is Japan’s first permanent LGBTQ+ community center. The statement that Tokyo 2020 sent to the Blade notes the visit.

“President Hashimoto Seiko visited Pride House Tokyo Legacy for the purpose of gaining, on behalf of Tokyo 2020, an understanding of how diversity and inclusion can be promoted through dialogue,” said Tokyo 2020. “She further aims to bolster Tokyo 2020’s LGBTQ legacy through partnership with Pride House Tokyo, whose key message is ‘Everyone should be able to live in their own way without discrimination or harassment, understanding and respecting each other’s differences.’”

The statement notes Tokyo 2020 “will share information and raise awareness on LGBTQ issues, sport, culture and education” in its official program. Tokyo 2020 also told the Blade that “diversity and inclusion … is essential to achieving the Tokyo 2020 games vision and delivering successful games.”

“Tokyo 2020 will embrace ‘diversity’ by celebrating the differences of individuals, while ‘inclusion’ will see people accepted and respected regardless of age, ethnicity, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs or intellectual or physical impairment,” reads the statement.

“People of diverse backgrounds influence each other, and these differences lead to the creation of new values within organizations and societies,” it added. “Tokyo 2020 want to achieve diversity and inclusion through ‘Know Differences, Show Differences,’ allowing each person to demonstrate their full capabilities because everyone will understand and respect each other.”

Tokyo 2020 further said it “will share this approach with athletes, spectators and games-related personnel. By raising awareness of D&I (diversity and inclusion) to everyone taking part in or attending the games, Tokyo 2020 aims to make D&I an integral part of Japanese society as a post-games legacy.”

The IOC Press Office on Friday in a statement to the Blade noted IOC President Thomas Bach has expressed his support for Pride House Tokyo Legacy and welcomes Tokyo 2020’s efforts to “embed diversity and inclusion in the Olympic Games model.”

The statement notes it is IOC “policy that we hear all concerns, which are directly related to the Olympic Games, and address them through our partners, the organizing committees.”

“The IOC addresses each and every one individually,” the IOC told the BLade.

The IOC said it works “to ensure these principles are applied in practice,” noting the Russian government in 2014 ensured it would not discriminate against athletes who participated in the Sochi games after President Vladimir Putin signed a law that banned the promotion of so-called gay propaganda to minors.

“At the same time, the IOC has neither the mandate nor the capability to change the laws or the political system of a sovereign country,” the IOC told the Blade. “This must rightfully remain the legitimate role of governments and respective intergovernmental organizations.”

The Olympics were supposed to take place in 2020, but the pandemic prompted officials to postpone them. They are now scheduled to open on July 23 and close on Aug. 8. The Paralympics are slated to take place from Aug. 24 through Sept. 5.

Advocacy groups in Japan and around the world are using the Olympics to underscore the lack of LGBTQ rights in the country.

This article originally appeared in the Washington Blade and is made available in partnership with the National LGBT Media Association.

Liz Truss urges Tory government to pull out of leading Stonewall LGBT+ scheme – PinkNews

Equalities minister Liz Truss arrives at Downing Street (WIktor Szymanowicz/NurPhoto/ Getty)

Equalities minister Liz Truss is pushing all government departments to withdraw from a major Stonewall employment scheme promoting LGBT+ acceptance.

The Stonewall Diversity Champions programme is described as “the leading employers’ programme for ensuring all LGBT+ staff are accepted without exception in the workplace”.

It counts 250 government departments and public bodies among its 850 members, who are given the tools and training to embed LGBT+ inclusion in their working practices.

Membership starts at around £2,500 and participants are ranked on a workplace equality index which publicly celebrates the top 100 employers each year.

The Times reports that Truss questioned the point of being in the scheme after the government’s Equality and Human Rights Commission raised concerns over its “value for money”. The EHRC itself left the scheme in March citing cost reasons.

The decision to cut ties has come amid bitter clashes between Stonewall and the government commission over the issue of trans rights.

Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the EHRC’s newly-appointed chairwoman, recently suggested it is “entirely reasonable” to question trans people’s gender identity and that cis women should freely express “gender critical” views without being “abused”.

As head of the commission she has controversially backed the appeal of Maya Forstater, a woman who tried and failed to convince an employment tribunal that her anti-trans views should be a protected “philosophical belief”.

Stonewall’s chief executive, Nancy Kelley, replied that although Stonewall believed in freedom of speech it was “not without limit”.

She told the BBC: “With all beliefs, including controversial beliefs, there is a right to express those beliefs publicly and where they’re harmful or damaging – whether it’s antisemitic beliefs, gender-critical beliefs, beliefs about disability – we have legal systems that are put in place for people who are harmed by that.”

News that the EHRC left the Diversity Champions scheme in March came days after Stonewall and several other LGBT+ groups signed an open letter criticising the commission’s “deeply damaging” messaging on trans people, as well as its LGBT+ record as a whole.

Now several other government bodies, including the House of Commons and the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency, have followed the EHRC in withdrawing from the Stonewall scheme.

The Crown Prosecution Service has also said that it is reviewing its membership; however the ultimate decision on whether to withdraw lies with the Cabinet Office.

It’s the latest strike against Stonewall after a “coordinated attack” in mainstream media last week which saw the Diversity Champions scheme accused of providing “unlawful advice” on trans rights.

The barrage was prompted when Essex University, a member of the scheme, was forced to apologised for cancelling invitations to two anti-trans academics.

Regarding the incident, Stonewall said: “The programme and our staff have absolutely no sway over any organisation’s wider decision-making.

“A recent report on free speech at University of Essex referenced Stonewall’s membership of the Diversity Champions programme. These claims had no basis, Stonewall staff had no involvement at all in this decision.”

As the Pandemic Wanes, Sexually Transmitted Infections Are Likely to Rise – Scientific American

If you were paying attention to social media recently, you might have come across a viral ad for EXTRA gum depicting scenes of postpandemic life: people slowly peeking out from behind closed doors, shutting their laptops before bursting maskless out of their toilet paper–filled dens into the street. The actors, all unwashed and unkempt, run gleefully to the nearest park where each proceeds to pounce on the first stranger they encounter and initiate a passionate make-out session, set to Celine Dion’s power ballad “It’s All Coming Back to Me Now.”

It’s been over 100 years since the “Spanish” flu pandemic stifled our sex lives to the extent that we’ve experienced during COVID-19. As a sexual health physician and researcher, I can attest to seeing empty waiting rooms for months as people kept their social and sexual distance, their desire squelched by fear of contagion. Certainly there were some for whom pandemic-induced abstinence was short-lived, and I was gratified to see public health agencies in New York and Canada cheerfully providing guidance on the matter: encouraging masked sex or even use of glory holes in barriers such as bathroom doors to facilitate anonymous oral sex.

For the most part though, our sexual appetites languished alongside our psyches as we exhausted our energy just trying to survive. And it wasn’t just Americans: studies from the U.K., China, Israel and Australia found that 40–60 percent of people reduced their number of sexual partners or the frequency of sex during the pandemic. As a consequence of our collective abstinence (plus a national shortage of testing kits), rates of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in the U.S. plummeted in the second quarter of 2020, after previously reaching record highs in 2019

Now that vaccines have arrived in the U.S. en masse, there’s little holding us back from having sex again. Celine Dion’s ballad would imply that our muscle memory around sex will be like that of riding a bicycle: even if we haven’t done it for a while, we still haven’t forgotten how. What isn’t clear is whether we’ll still have the drive. For nearly two decades prior to the pandemic, American sexuality had been on a downward slope, even among the most sexually active age demographic. In a study of over 9,000 adults based on surveys from 2000 to 2018, a third of young men aged 18–24 reported no sexual activity in 2018; activity also declined over the study period for both men and women aged 25–34.  

For those of us who do resume having sex, it’s logical to think that a year of living with COVID, donning masks, getting tested and negotiating safe socializing would translate to discussing safer sex. Not so, says Lisa Wade of Tulane University, who has interviewed over 120 college students about sexual behavior during the pandemic. Despite a diversity of race, sexual orientation and prior sexual experience among her study participants, when asked whether living through COVID has changed the way they think about sex and STIs, their responses are “strikingly consistent”: a wrinkled nose, a look of confusion, and a resounding “no.”

Wade’s students are testing 2–3 times per week for COVID and have no qualms about asking each other about their test results. Yet asking about testing for STIs does not come as naturally. STIs are still accompanied by a stigma that shrouds these discussions in judgment along the lines of, “Why would you need to test?” and “What have you been up to?” Even those who felt comfortable asking others to wear a mask can find it awkward to ask a partner to use condoms or are met with resistance when such requests are made.

Our resistance to condoms and barriers cuts across gender, age and sexual orientation. HIV researchers have long understood the concept of “condom fatigue” among men who have sex with men, a weariness experienced after years being told to use condoms by HIV prevention campaigns. As Benjamin Klassen of Simon Fraser University found in 2019, condoms among gay men now hold similar status as public transportation: something you’d love everyone else to use without having to use it yourself.

Condoms are losing popularity with the Generation Z set as well, even though teens are the age group most likely to use condoms. According to the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Survey, condom use by high school students during their most recent sexual encounter declined from 62 percent in 2007 to 54 percent in 2019.  The outlook is even worse for dental dams, squares of latex placed over the vulva for oral sex. Juliet Richters of University of New South Wales found less than 10 percent of Australian women who had sex with women had ever used a dental dam, and only 2 percent used them consistently.

In our current era of technological innovation, it seems like we should have something better than barriers—perhaps a smartphone app or an STI-blasting laser. Yet condoms remain the only multipurpose prevention device that provides both contraception and protection against STIs/HIV. But hopefully that’s set to change. Groups such as the global Initiative for Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (IMPT) are working to advance the development of at least 20 products: pills, rings, diaphragms, gels, injectables and implants, with each product providing protection against at least two conditions: unplanned pregnancy, STIs, or HIV.

What about building a better condom? The Gates Foundation tried to give it a go, offering $100,000 seed grants to companies in 2013 to develop a next-generation condom that “preserves or enhances pleasure” in order to “improve uptake and regular use.” By 2019 three of the 11 initial awardees had received an additional $1 million to advance to the clinical trial stage. Whether these products survived the pandemic and will make it to market remains to be seen. At least for the moment, traditional condom sales are surging, but unlikely to endure long term as we fall back into our old usage patterns.

Then there’s always hope of an STI vaccine. While there are none immediately forthcoming, new clinical trials are ongoing for vaccines against herpes and gonorrhea. And as Operation Warp Speed has shown, pharmaceutical companies can create effective vaccines quickly with enough political will and financial support.

But whether the future of prevention is a better condom, a new device or an STI vaccine is unimportant. What’s crucial is having prevention products that people will actually use. If predictions of a Roaring Twenties redux or a post-COVID Summer of Love hold true, then a rise in STIs and HIV are sure to follow. It will take more than our old barrier methods to meet the current needs of our sexually diverse population. We must invest in development of new prevention products now, or risk being caught with our pants down later.

This is an opinion and analysis article.

Sicilian Governor apologises after gay couple attacked – English – ANSA

(ANSA) – ROME, MAY 31 – Sicilian Governor Nello Musumeci
apologised on Monday after a gay couple from Turin were attacked
while on holiday in Palermo at the weekend.
    The gay men were surrounded by a group of young people who
targetted them because they were holding hands.
    They verbally and physically attacked the couple and one of the
men needed hospital treatment.
    “Sicily has always been a generous, welcoming land,” Musumeci
said.
    “So the attack on the gay tourist couple by some very young
thugs should be condemned without hesitation.
    “I apologise to the two victims of this absurd intolerance”.
    The incident reignited the debate about a bill against
homophobia that is currently blocked in parliament due to
opposition from centre-right parties. (ANSA).
   

A Letter to My Gay Friends – Ricochet – Ricochet.com

June is widely recognized as “Pride Month,” and I’m sure we’ll see lots of reminders of that over the next few weeks. Most people aren’t aware that the Pride movement was inspired by, and is in part to commemorate, a specific series of events, the Stonewall Riots in New York City in 1969.

Like members of many other minority groups in American history, homosexual men and women faced discrimination, both legal and cultural, that was overcome only slowly and often at great personal cost. But it was overcome: today people who experience same-sex attraction have the same rights as heterosexuals and enjoy widespread public acceptance.

While the acronym “LGBT” (often with additional letters appended) is now ubiquitous, some in the gay community recognize, correctly I think, a problem with the inclusion of gender identity (trans, etc.) in what has traditionally been a gay rights movement. While the LGB movement sought equality and acceptance, the trans movement attempts to demand more than that and does so in ways that many people reasonably find objectionable.

Many of us don’t want to be told what to say, what pronouns to use, that our daughters must compete against biological males in sporting events, and share locker rooms with them in school. We also reject the seemingly nonsensical notion that we should pretend a boy is a girl simply because the boy declares that he is a girl. We resent the myriad circumlocutions increasingly required to avoid recognizing simple sexual reality: such nonsense as calling mothers “birthing people,” for example.

Beyond that, the trans movement is fundamentally hostile to the notion of basic human sexuality, and in particular of womanhood. It represents the final denial that men and women are different in important ways, in favor of a fictitious equivalence that, predictably, tends to serve men well at the expense of women.

I think there is a growing awareness among some in the gay community that there will be pushback against the increasingly extreme and unacceptable demands of the trans movement, and that, to the extent the gay movement is seen as inextricably bound to the trans movement, that pushback may undermine and threaten legitimate gains made by gay rights activists. It’s perfectly reasonable to encourage tolerance and understanding of people who are different; it isn’t reasonable to demand professions of belief and unacceptable accommodations (e.g., in athletics) based on a fanciful reimagining of human sexuality.

I think it would be prudent to begin to question whether being strongly allied with the so-called “trans” movement is in anyone’s best interests.

Published in Culture

Lance Loud Was an Early Reality Star. He Was Also a Gay Punk Pioneer. – The New York Times

On February 20, 1973, Lance Loud earned a place in musical history that, at the time, nearly stopped his career cold.

That night, he appeared with his band, Loud!, on “The Dick Cavett Show” as part of an evening devoted to “An American Family,” the PBS program credited as TV’s first reality show. The cinéma vérité series, which featured the entire Loud clan, both riveted and appalled the nation with two revelations: the collapse of the parents’ marriage right on camera, and their eldest son, 20-year-old Lance, making his gay identity extravagantly clear. It was a profoundly rare declaration in that era of television, and by performing on Cavett, Lance led what was likely the first rock group with openly gay members to appear on a major commercial network.

“We never considered ourselves a ‘gay band,’” said Kristian Hoffman, Lance’s best friend, who wrote most of the group’s music. “We were a band.” But Loud! did have a broader identity challenge. “They saw us as this joke band from television,” Hoffman recalled from his home in Los Angeles. “No one took us seriously.”

At least, not at the start. But once the punk scene began, and Loud! morphed into the band Mumps, the group dovetailed perfectly with “the new culture of shock,” as Hoffman put it. Fans clamored for its Technicolor mix of glam-rock and operatic pop, which smashed together influences from Sparks, Roxy Music and the Kinks, crowned by Loud’s hyperbolic singing.

In 1975, Mumps became one of the first bands to play CBGB, opening for Television. They went on to become staples at that club, as well as at Max’s Kansas City, and toured the United States, even opening some shows for Cheap Trick and Van Halen. “They were one of the most interesting bands ever to perform at CBGBs,” the Talking Heads’ drummer Chris Frantz wrote in an email. “Their music was a unique mix of sweet and naughty.”

Yet, in their six years together (with a lineup that shifted a few times), Mumps never earned an album deal, managing to issue just two indie singles.

Now, nearly five decades later, in a music industry teeming with out L.G.B.T.Q. acts, Mumps are getting another shot. On Friday, the label Omnivore Recordings, known for releasing rare material from artists like Buck Owens and Alex Chilton, is releasing “Rock & Roll This, Rock & Roll That,” a 23-song compilation of the band’s work that’s the first to feature material from Loud! The release also marks a sad milestone: the 20th anniversary of Lance’s death of complications from hepatitis C.

The roots of Loud! began at Santa Barbara High School, where Hoffman first met Loud in art class. “I was the teacher’s pet, and Lance was the funniest guy in the room,” said Hoffman, who played keyboards in the band.

He cited Pat Loud — the family’s matriarch, who died in January at 94 — as the group’s first cheerleader: “The family had all these musical instruments laying around in the garage, and she encouraged everyone to get in there and play.” Two bands came out of the Loud household: the one seen on the PBS show featuring sons Grant and Kevin, the other led by Lance. “They had the skill,” Hoffman quipped. “We had the will.”

(They also had the chutzpah. After Hoffman and Loud attended the notorious Altamont festival in 1969, where they saw the Rolling Stones perform the not-yet-recorded song “Brown Sugar,” they not only started playing it in their sets, they took credit for writing it.)

Once “An American Family” became a sensation and the invitation came from Cavett, Pat agreed only if her children’s bands could play. But as Hoffman recalled, the performance was met by the studio audience “with a profound silence.”

To complicate matters, Loud was still reeling from bruising press, including a lengthy New York Times article published two days earlier that referred to his “flamboyant, leechlike homosexuality,” and went on to call him “the evil flower of the Loud family,” who lives in a world of “backward genders.” Hoffman said that the unflagging support of both men’s families made them both fully confident in their sexuality and gave them strength to persevere.

The band was buoyed by its nascent talent, including the drummer Jay Dee Daugherty, who went on to play in the Patti Smith Group; and an agile guitarist, Rob Duprey, who later worked with Iggy Pop. As their frontman, Loud proved so energetic, his sweat became a feature of their show. “He could actually aim it at someone,” Hoffman said. “And because CBGBs was so crowded, they couldn’t get away.”

The hip label Bomp Records released their debut single, “I Like to Be Clean,” a wry anti-sex anthem, and Mumps snagged Sparks’ manager, Joseph Fleury. Yet, when Fleury pitched A&M Records on both Mumps and another band he handled, the Dickies, the label snapped up only one, telling the manager, “We don’t want ‘the gay band.’”

“Those were the exact words,” Hoffman said, noting the irony that at a time when ostensibly straight rock stars were rewarded for gay affectations, actual gay people were punished for them. “Freddie Mercury had to pretend to be straight to be a rock star,” Hoffman said incredulously. “Freddie Mercury!”

Mumps songs never featured gay love scenarios, preferring sardonic observations and satirical exaggerations. Their second single, “Rock & Roll This, Rock & Roll That,” sent up the slogan-like salutes to the genre in song titles that, by then, had become a groaning cliché. “That was specifically written when Lou Reed titled his album ‘Rock ’n’ Roll Animal,’” Hoffman said. “How desperate must he have been to align himself with some trope in its death throes to sell a record?”

An intrigued Sire Records commissioned some demos from Mumps but ultimately passed. At the same time, other artists recognized Mumps’ rarity and worth. “The caliber of their musicianship was high,” said Clem Burke, the drummer for Blondie, who shared many bills with Mumps. “They were energetic and fun and probably smarter than most of the other bands on the scene. In fact, they may have been too smart for their own good.”

What impressed Rufus Wainwright most was that Mumps “followed no creed,” he said. “It wasn’t exactly punk or musical theater, but it had aspects of both. And they managed to put the dramatic flair of opera into a rock band. Plus, Lance was so sexy.”

Still, the eccentricity of the music, with its fitful chord progressions and askew melodies, could be daunting for audiences to fathom and for Loud to sing. “I wrote songs that didn’t always play to Lance’s strength,” Hoffman admitted. “But he was one of the greatest frontmen of all time.”

Mumps’ lack of success led to their 1979 split, after which Hoffman worked with artists including Klaus Nomi and James Chance, while Loud sustained a successful career in music journalism. (He contributed regularly to the magazines Details and Interview.) The two stayed best friends until Loud’s 2001 death. Now Hoffman is proud their music may finally reach a wider audience.

“We were out of our time back then,” he said. “If we came up now, who knows?”